Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
Posibacteria, Eurybacteria and Glidobacteria are all paraphyletic grades, but nonetheless good taxa.
Proof The proof is a modification of the proof for Theorem 2. The "good" taxa are placed in the same way and the bad taxa are placed onto any split corresponding to a conflicting split in.
There will be n good "good" taxa that are placed onto edges without introducing an increase in the distance; and n bad "bad" taxa that are placed onto nodes and will increase the distance by one; n T = n good + n bad.
Similar(57)
Despite most systematists adhering to cladistics since Hennig [ 46], many "good" Lepidoptera taxa, including those within Sphingidae [ 17], lack reliable (private) morphological synapomorphies which would enable rapid assignment of species to higher taxa.
Canonical variate 1 (CV1) accounted for 63.2% of the variance and showed good separation of taxa (Fig. 7).
In the phylogenomic context of multiple loci, a natural question is when can phylogenetic information from different loci be combined to produce a good tree with all taxa present, even when taxa are missing for some loci?
Thus, a retention ratio larger than 1 indicates good retention of the taxa in the reactor.
The clade of the remaining euthyneuran taxa receives good support (85 BS/1.0 PP).
Genealogical paraphyly or polyphyly at individual loci are simply not very good means of lumping taxa together as species [ 5, 49].
Because of the combination of scaffold and clade-based source trees, and because all were larger than some minimum size, we were able to achieve good coverage of most taxa in the model tree.
In well-known taxa with good sampling coverage, identification rates via DNA-barcoding can be quite successful (e.g.,[ 12, 13]), but in case of meiofauna finding identical sequences in public databases for a newly collected mollusk or other under-investigated taxon is not expected to become the rule for decades to come.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com