I think that was good" (Respondent no. 11) The respondents had positive experiences of the way they had been offered help.
Sixty-eight per cent of the responses were described as "terrible" (can't you feel your chest swelling with pride?), 30% were "OK", and just 2% were "good", where respondents actually tried to find someone within the organisation who could speak the same language.
Therefore, in a good design respondents may often find themselves close to indifference and thus perception thresholds may be an issue.
To determine which cities were most-closely associated with good food, respondents were asked to look at a list of subjects including food and indicate which ones they would find interesting in the city.
Knowledge on PMTCT and ART was also good among respondents.
While this analysis contributed to our understanding of the elements of good practice, respondents also discussed the factors which enabled good practice to happen.
You don't feel they should come to you and ask whether you feel it is a good cause?" "Respondent: No, I think it would depend on them.
These rankings are the differential between respondents' "good" versus' "poor" response to the government's performance.
The effect of explicitly stating the price of the good to the respondents seems to be insignificant.
Conjoint choice experiments elicit individuals' preferences for the attributes of a good by asking respondents to indicate repeatedly their most preferred alternative in a number of choice sets.
Recuperation after the fall was judged reasonable to good by 236 respondents (71%).
