Sentence examples for good reproducibility between from inspiring English sources
TAC technology allows users to spot customized assays and design TAC layout, simplify assay setup, conserve specimen, dramatically reduce contamination potential, and as demonstrated in this study, analyze multiple samples in parallel with good reproducibility between instruments and operators.
We found a good reproducibility between A and B for total energy (ICC = 0.82), carbohydrate (ICC = 0.83), lipid (ICC = 0.81) and protein intake (ICC = 0.79) and for meal mechanics parameters.
An inter-laboratory trial was not able to fully validate the test for good reproducibility (between laboratories) for Pb.
All the other lymph nodes (lateral iliac lymph nodes iliac bifurcation lymph nodes, common iliac lymph nodes, lumbo-aortic mesenteric lymph nodes) had good reproducibility between the four physicians with kappa between 0.559 CII −0.021 to 1) and 0.806 CI 0.587 to 0.9655).
The intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.810 for VEGF-C (P<0.001) and 0.834 for VEGFR-3 (P<0.001) indicating good reproducibility between the two investigating pathologists.
There was good reproducibility between the two investigating pathologists.
Column leaching test show a good reproducibility (deviation between replicates in general <20 %) and robustness [44].
Inter-assay variation coefficients ranged from 1.1 to 2.4% for MSC_0136 and from 0.8 to 2.9% for MSC_1046 indicating a good reproducibility also between different runs.
With a low (25 MBq) injection dose, the good reproducibility was observed between the collimators when a heavy (2.5-mm kernel size) smoothing was applied.
The composite liver gene expression profiles for all genes (unfiltered) displayed good reproducibility in general between animals of the same sex and age group with average Pearson's correlations of R = 0.986 between biological replicates of the same sex and age.
Although the low mean difference between the tests (2 s) suggests good reproducibility, the actual variability between the tests was not mentioned, making it impossible to compare these results to our study (Belardinelli et al. 1998).
