Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
good correspondence
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"good correspondence" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when referring to the quality of written communication between two or more people. For example, "We appreciate your good correspondence regarding the new project."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
close correlation
proper condition
good endeavour
comparable results
working order
reasonable consistency
considerable correspondence
notable correspondence
substantial correspondence
adequate correspondence
cordial correspondence
ideal correspondence
decent order
better order
best order
good related
well order
notable similarity
good notice
good order
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Both results showed good correspondence.
Science
Generally, good correspondence between fluxes was observed.
Also here fairly good correspondence is observed.
Good correspondence between simulations and experiments was achieved.
Good correspondence is found between the different methods.
RSM analysis indicated good correspondence between experimental and predicted values.
RSM analysis showed good correspondence between experimental and predicted values.
Science
A good correspondence is found with the MC simulations.
Science
Further they show good correspondence with X-ray diffraction.
Science
The results of calculations show good correspondence with the actual behaviour of natural ecosystems.
Science
In general, very good correspondence is found between the analysis and test results.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "good correspondence", ensure you clearly state what elements are showing the agreement or similarity, providing context for your statement.
Common error
Avoid using "good correspondence" when the similarity is only superficial or when there are significant discrepancies. Be precise in describing the level of agreement to avoid misleading your audience.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "good correspondence" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It indicates the existence of a favorable relationship or similarity between two or more entities or sets of data. As evidenced by Ludwig, this phrase is commonly used in scientific literature to describe relationships between experimental data and theoretical models.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "good correspondence" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, particularly within scientific and technical domains. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase effectively communicates a notable level of agreement or similarity between compared elements. While predominantly found in formal and scientific contexts, its accurate usage enhances clarity and precision in writing. To ensure effective communication, it's crucial to specify what elements exhibit the correspondence and avoid overstating the degree of similarity. Alternatives like "strong agreement" or "close correlation" may be considered based on the specific nuance intended.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
strong agreement
This alternative emphasizes the degree of agreement rather than the similarity in behavior.
close correlation
This alternative uses statistical terminology to denote a similarity in trends.
high degree of consistency
This alternative highlights the reliability and repeatability of the similarity.
substantial alignment
This alternative implies that the similar elements are well-positioned relative to each other.
reasonable consistency
This alternative denotes a moderate level of agreement or similarity.
marked resemblance
This alternative focuses on visual or observable similarities.
notable similarity
This alternative stresses the importance or remarkableness of the likeness.
comparable results
This alternative specifically discusses similarities in outcomes or data.
matching behavior
This alternative focuses on the similarity in how things act or perform.
analogous pattern
This alternative emphasizes the structural similarity between different entities or events.
FAQs
How can I use "good correspondence" in a sentence?
You can use "good correspondence" to describe the relationship between sets of data, experimental results, or theoretical predictions. For example, "There is a good correspondence between the model's predictions and the observed data."
What phrases are similar to "good correspondence"?
Alternatives to "good correspondence" include "strong agreement", "close correlation", or "high degree of consistency".
Is it acceptable to use "good correspondence" in formal writing?
Yes, "good correspondence" is acceptable in formal writing, particularly in scientific and technical contexts, to denote a strong similarity or agreement between different sets of data or observations.
How does "good correspondence" differ from "perfect agreement"?
"Good correspondence" suggests a high level of similarity or agreement, but it does not imply a complete or exact match. "Perfect agreement" indicates that the compared elements are identical.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested