going to be started

USAGE SUMMARY

"going to be started" is correct and usable in written English.
It is usually used to indicate an impending event or activity. For example, "We are going to be starting our new project at the beginning of next month."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

"It wasn't going to be started for a long time," the employee said.

The New York Times

The new direction that is going to be started tonight needs to continue".

The New York Times

But that fund wasn't going to be started until February 2009.

Forbes

There was this panel [with] you, myself, Sean Parker on where were the next great companies going to be started.

Forbes

"Think of all the new lives that are going to be started here," Najarian said.

Los Angeles Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

And that's going to be starting next year.

The New York Times

"We're going to be starting those negotiations relatively soon.

The Washington Post

Now we're going to be starting from scratch".

The Guardian

"The train is going to be starting to move," Mr. Nittve said.

The New York Times

"Let's say we introduce that he's going to be starting.

The New York Times - Sports

"She's going to be starting soon, writing about sex and power.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the audience and context to determine if a more formal synonym such as "will commence" or "will be initiated" would be more appropriate.

Common error

Avoid overuse of the passive voice with "going to be started". Whenever possible, rephrase to use an active voice to make the writing more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The project is going to be started by the team", use "The team is going to start the project".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "going to be started" functions as a future passive construction, indicating that an action of starting will be performed on a subject in the future. As Ludwig AI states, it is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "going to be started" is a grammatically sound but infrequently used phrase that indicates a future passive action. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, while suggesting careful consideration of active voice alternatives for improved clarity. Predominantly found in "News & Media" and "Academia", the phrase serves to announce future initiations, with a neutral register applicable across various contexts. When writing, clarity can be enhanced by specifying the agent if relevant and by considering more formal synonyms like "will be initiated" depending on the context. Overusing the passive voice must be avoided in order to make the writing more direct and engaging.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

will be initiated

Replaces "going to be started" with a more formal, single-word verb.

will commence

Substitutes "going to be started" with a single word suggesting a formal beginning.

is scheduled to begin

Indicates a planned start, emphasizing the timing aspect.

is set to launch

Implies a formal introduction or beginning of something new.

will be activated

Suggests bringing something into operation or use.

is about to get underway

Emphasizes the imminent nature of the start.

is on the verge of beginning

Highlights the closeness to the starting point.

is expected to be underway soon

Indicates an anticipated start in the near future.

will be set in motion

Suggests the triggering of an action or process.

is slated to get going

Replaces "going to be started" with more informal alternative.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "going to be started" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives such as "will be initiated", "will commence", or "is scheduled to begin".

What's the difference between "going to be started" and "going to start"?

"Going to start" implies an active action where someone is performing the starting. "Going to be started" is passive and suggests something is having a start performed on it.

Is "going to be started" always grammatically correct?

While grammatically correct, "going to be started" can sometimes sound awkward or indirect. Evaluate whether an active voice construction would improve clarity and conciseness.

What are some situations where "going to be started" is best used?

"Going to be started" is suitable when emphasizing that an action will be performed on something, and the actor is less important or unknown. However, ensure the passive voice doesn't obscure meaning.