Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "going in depth" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when you want to describe a detailed examination of a particular topic. For example: "This report will analyze the company's financial situation by going in depth into its income statement."
Exact(4)
During a Build Series interview with HuffPost this week, she averted going in depth on the subject of salary, but did say, "I know there's a lot in the news, not all of which you should listen to about people's salaries, and not everything you read on the internet is true".
However they give an estimate of the degradation of the image expected when going in depth in the sample.
This illustrates the emergent character of the 'essentiality by location' principle: the arising of lethality by the summation of two non lethal events derives from the existence of a global metabolism architecture and thus cannot be inferred by going in depth into the nature of the two enzymes, in other words is a collective emergent property of the network system [ 11].
Before going in depth with any religion it would be a good idea to understand what religion is in general.
Similar(55)
We're not going in-depth on cars".
"We are going in-depth to regain the tape of that interview," Villas-Boas said.
Unfortunately, while going in-depth to detail the art, cigar-making and Latin dancing Americans might enjoy while visiting Cuba on one of these trips, The Times failed to make any mention of the ongoing human rights abuses being committed by the Cuban regime or how the regime benefits financially from American tourism.
He does a good job going in-depth in his responses, and seems pretty open.
Keen to get an original version, Villas-Boas said: "We are going in-depth to regain the tape of that interview.
However, in order to avoid biases and stay neutral to data we used the method of "bracketing" [ 62], which here meant not excluding contradictory findings and not going in-depth into existing theories until we had analyzed the data.
It doesn't go in-depth enough.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com