Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
In Hartshorne's view, the importance of the ontological argument is to establish that God could not exist contingently.
Aquinas had considered this form of the objection in his De aeternitate mundi, and had noted that it has not yet been demonstrated that God could not produce an actual infinity of spiritual beings.
Given that God can unite souls with human bodies, it is hard to see what reason there is for thinking that God could not unite souls with digital computers (or rocks, for that matter!).
If they were about, God could not be far behind.
God could not have allowed the entire family to perish.
"God could not be everywhere, so he made mothers".
God could not be everywhere, as the proverb goes, so he created mothers.
God could not accept someone who was unacceptable, but he could impart something that would make humans acceptable.
"Lincoln maintained that God could not forgive; that punishment has to follow the sin," Herndon wrote in 1870.
The Christians maintain that God could not redeem mankind until He let His only son die on the Cross.
For Christians, he suggested, God could not be other than reasonable, and He could never bless violence as a way of compelling people's obedience.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com