Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
In 529 cases including 280 non-enzymes and 21 for metal ion ligands the expected accuracy is 84% at any GO depth and 94% down to GO depth 3, while for the remaining 931 the expected accuracies are 60%and71%1%, respectively.
Higher prediction accuracy is expected as we lower the GO depth.
Clustering coefficient seems to slightly escape to this trend by reducing its value as the GO depth increases.
This is probably an effect of the reduction in the number of proteins as the GO depth increases that affects more to this network property.
As GO depth increases, the annotation becomes more detailed.
We next provide finer and more precise functional annotations (i.e. improved GO depth) by curating literature.
Similar(47)
The positive predictive value for all GO depths (all-depth PPV) was 84%, and it rose to 94% over GO depths 1 3 (depth 3 PPV).
We didn't go in depth, but I just feel bad for him.
OK, tick, you did it," but we'll really go in depth.
"I like to read, and when I read I study — I go into depth," he told me.
In this week's podcast: Larry Light and Paul Maidment go in depth with the 2006 Midyear Investment Guide.
More suggestions(6)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com