Sentence examples for gm science from inspiring English sources

This paper critically reviews the latest GM science and discusses the key ethical objections to HGGM.

Deb, who was a Fulbright scholar and who has done post-doctoral ecology work at the University of California at Berkeley, is not impressed by GM science or hybrid rice growing.

GM science may well produce some valuable gains, but products must face a severe testing regime, not just for human health, but, above all, for their potential damaging interaction with our natural delicate ecosystems.

Carlo Leifert, a world expert in organic food production, stepped down from Tony Blair's GM science review panel amid allegations that he was facing fierce pressure to toe a pro-biotech line.

Leaked documents from a PR company working for Brussels-based EuropaBio claim to have "had interest" from Sir Bob Geldof; the chancellor of Oxford University and BBC Trust chairman, Lord Patten; former Irish EU commissioner and attorney general David Byrne, and "potentially" the involvement of former UN secretary general Kofi Annan and pro-GM science writer Mark Lynas.

GM-free supermarket products imply that GM is "weird science", even though the European Commission has found no evidence of higher risk of negative health outcomes from GM food compared with conventional food in any of the research it has funded.

On the one hand, the EC is putting its faith in what it calls its own "science-based GM authorisation system", and on the other, saying member states can ignore the science and plough on regardless with anti-GM bans.

The complete isolation of crops grown on a commercial scale, either GM or non-GM, is not currently practical although gene flow can be minimized, as it currently is between oilseed rape varieties grown for food, feed or industrial oils (GM Science Review Panel).

SB is supported by pre-doctoral training grant in Pharmacological Sciences GM-062754.

The GM Science Review Panel (p.25) argues that: The Nuffield Council (p.44) recommends that "the same standards should be applied to the assessment of risks from GM and from non-GM plants and foods, and that the risks of inaction be given the same careful analysis as risks of action …" They further conclude (p.45): Science cannot declare any technology completely risk free.

All science, whether pro- or anti-GM in its conclusions, should be properly peer reviewed and sound.