Similar(60)
Two gene clusters were compared using the online software anti-SMASH, Glimmer 3.02 and Subsystem Technology (RAST).
Putative coding sequences (CDSs) were identified using glimmer [17].
Prediction of coding sequences (CDS) was accomplished using Critica [50], Glimmer [51] and Reganor [52].
In brief, gene predictions were done using a combination of GeneMark and Glimmer [80], [81], [82].
Glimmer [14] and GeneMark [15] were used independently to predict open reading frames (ORFs).
Glimmer 3.0 (default parameters) was used to predict open reading frames (ORFs) [42].
An initial set of predicted protein-coding regions was identified using GLIMMER [91], [92].
An initial set of genes predicted to encode proteins was identified with GLIMMER [40].
An initial set of ORFs that likely encode proteins was identified using GLIMMER [34].
Glimmer 3.02 was used to predict protein-coding genes using default parameters.
Genes were identified using a combination of Critica [38] and Glimmer [39].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com