glaring shortfalls

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "glaring shortfalls" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe significant deficiencies or shortcomings that are very obvious or noticeable. Example: "The report highlighted the glaring shortfalls in the company's safety protocols that need immediate attention."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

China, ranked a disappointing No. 75, also performs admirably on economic fundamentals, clocking in at No. 29, but is hammered for glaring shortfalls in democracy, personal freedom and governance as well as health and education.

Forbes

Other glaring shortfalls are evident.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

And it is in this province where the incumbent's shortfall has been most glaring".

Huffington Post

The problems were glaring.

The New Yorker

The injustice is glaring".

The New York Times

Glaring at her.

The New Yorker

The changes are glaring.

The New York Times - Sports

The irony was glaring.

The New York Times

The need is glaring.

The New York Times - Sports

His absence is glaring.

The New York Times - Sports

There were glaring violations.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "glaring shortfalls", ensure you provide specific examples to support your claim and illustrate the severity of the deficiencies.

Common error

Avoid using "glaring shortfalls" as a general statement without backing it up with concrete evidence. Always provide context and specific examples to demonstrate the magnitude of the problem.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "glaring shortfalls" functions primarily as a noun phrase with an adjectival modifier. "Glaring" modifies "shortfalls", emphasizing the obviousness and severity of the deficiencies. Ludwig confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "glaring shortfalls" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe significant and obvious deficiencies. Ludwig indicates that this phrase is correct and usable in written English. While relatively infrequent, it appears primarily in news and media contexts, serving to highlight areas needing improvement. When employing this phrase, ensure it is supported by specific examples to maximize impact. Consider alternatives like "obvious deficiencies" or "evident shortcomings" for similar effect.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious deficiencies

Replaces "glaring" with "obvious", emphasizing the clear and apparent nature of the deficiencies.

evident shortcomings

Substitutes both words with near synonyms, keeping the meaning virtually unchanged.

noticeable inadequacies

Emphasizes the visibility and insufficient nature of the issues.

conspicuous lacks

Highlights that the shortfalls are easily seen or remarked upon.

significant gaps

Uses a metaphor to describe missing or insufficient elements.

major weaknesses

Focuses on the areas of lacking strength or effectiveness.

critical failings

Stresses that the shortfalls are important and detrimental.

serious flaws

Highlights the severe imperfections or faults.

pronounced deficits

Emphasizes the clear and measurable lack.

acute insufficiencies

Focuses on the severity and inadequacy.

FAQs

What does "glaring shortfalls" mean?

The phrase "glaring shortfalls" refers to deficiencies or inadequacies that are very obvious and easily noticeable. It suggests that something is significantly lacking or incomplete in a way that is hard to ignore.

How can I use "glaring shortfalls" in a sentence?

You can use "glaring shortfalls" to describe issues in various contexts. For instance: "The audit revealed "obvious deficiencies" in the company's financial reporting."

What are some alternatives to "glaring shortfalls"?

Alternatives include "evident shortcomings", "noticeable inadequacies", or "conspicuous lacks", all of which convey a similar meaning of significant and obvious deficiencies.

Is it appropriate to use "glaring shortfalls" in formal writing?

Yes, "glaring shortfalls" can be used in formal writing, particularly when you want to emphasize the clear and undeniable nature of the deficiencies. However, ensure your language remains objective and supported by evidence.