Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
glaring gap
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"glaring gap" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to describe a noticeable and obvious lack or flaw in something. You can use it in various contexts, such as business reports, academic essays, or informal writing. Example: In the company's financial report, there was a glaring gap between the projected revenue and the actual numbers from the previous quarter.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
55 human-written examples
There was also a glaring gap in the terms of reference.
News & Media
And there was a glaring gap: the report said nothing about corruption within EU institutions.
News & Media
The glaring gap in the Queen's speech proposals is of course Lords reform.
News & Media
First, Japan suffers from a glaring gap between large firms, which are highly profitable, and small ones.
News & Media
Time and again she ponders the glaring gap between everyday domestic life and nagging romance-novel fantasies.
News & Media
The measure, the Family Health Care Decisions Act, would fill a glaring gap in New York State law.
News & Media
But the glaring gap between the theory and the reality of discrimination is becoming a problem in France.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
4 human-written examples
Medicare's coverage has some glaring gaps that need fixing.
News & Media
Yet for whatever progress, glaring gaps and chronic flaws persist.
News & Media
Glaring gaps in knowledge uncovered by the inquiry, however, remain.
News & Media
That investigation exposed glaring gaps in disciplinary procedures.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "glaring gap" to emphasize a significant and easily noticeable deficiency or inconsistency in a situation, argument, or data set. This phrase is particularly effective when you want to draw attention to a critical oversight.
Common error
While "glaring gap" is widely accepted, avoid overusing it in very informal writing or conversations. More casual terms might be more appropriate depending on your audience and context.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "glaring gap" functions as a noun phrase, where "glaring" modifies the noun "gap". It typically acts as a subject, object, or complement within a sentence, emphasizing a significant and obvious deficiency or inconsistency.
Frequent in
News & Media
53%
Science
24%
Formal & Business
7%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "glaring gap" is a commonly used and grammatically sound phrase that effectively highlights significant deficiencies or inconsistencies. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's employed across various contexts, particularly in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business settings, indicating a neutral to professional tone. To enhance your writing, use it to emphasize critical oversights and avoid overuse in informal situations. Consider alternatives like "obvious deficiency" or "striking discrepancy" for nuanced expression. By understanding its function and appropriate usage, you can leverage "glaring gap" to strengthen your arguments and analysis.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
obvious deficiency
Replaces "gap" with "deficiency", focusing on the lack of something necessary.
striking discrepancy
Substitutes "gap" with "discrepancy", emphasizing a difference or inconsistency that is easily noticeable.
noticeable absence
Replaces both words, focusing on the lack of something that should be present.
evident shortcoming
Uses "shortcoming" instead of "gap", pointing out a flaw or imperfection that is clear.
patent inadequacy
Formal alternative, replacing "gap" with "inadequacy" to stress the insufficiency.
conspicuous omission
Emphasizes that something has been left out in a way that is very clear and obvious.
palpable void
Uses "void" to suggest a significant absence, making the lack feel tangible.
marked disparity
Highlights a significant difference between two things that is easily observed.
pronounced contrast
Similar to disparity, but focusing on the distinction being very noticeable.
serious flaw
Shifts the focus to a critical defect that is apparent and problematic.
FAQs
How can I use "glaring gap" in a sentence?
You can use "glaring gap" to highlight a significant omission or inconsistency. For example, "There's a glaring gap in the research on this topic" or "The company's marketing strategy has a glaring gap: it doesn't target younger consumers".
What can I say instead of "glaring gap"?
You can use alternatives like "obvious deficiency", "striking discrepancy", or "noticeable absence" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is "glaring gap" a formal or informal expression?
"Glaring gap" falls into a neutral to slightly formal register. It's appropriate for professional, academic, and journalistic writing, but might sound a bit too strong for very casual conversations.
What's the difference between "glaring gap" and "obvious gap"?
While similar, "glaring gap" emphasizes that the gap is not only obvious but also significant and problematic. "Obvious gap" simply indicates that something is clearly missing. The intensity differs.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested