glaring discrepancies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "glaring discrepancies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe obvious or significant differences or inconsistencies in data, statements, or situations. Example: "The audit revealed glaring discrepancies in the financial reports that needed immediate attention."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

THE police now admit that they missed glaring discrepancies between Mr. Sugaya's fabricated accounts of the killings and actual forensic evidence.

The New York Times

Over the years, there have been glaring discrepancies in the findings describing the relationship between BD and SES.

International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

In psychiatric literature stretching over a century, there have been glaring discrepancies in the findings describing the relationship between bipolar disorder (BD) and socioeconomic status (SES).

International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

Therefore, while glaring discrepancies exist among the ETX of different links for data packets, it is not for the Hello packets.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

A senior FDC official said there were "glaring discrepancies" with official figures.

Independent

But a teacher at I.S. 318 said there were glaring discrepancies between some of her students' class work and their exam scores.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

The paper tried to explain away the glaring discrepancy between her stories then and now by saying "at the time she was speaking she was still working for Polanski and, it could be argued, in thrall of him [sic]".

The Guardian - Opinion

When a reporter at the White House on Friday asked Sarah Huckabee Sanders about the glaring discrepancy between Kelly's account and the actual speech, she said that the White House stood by his remarks.

The New Yorker

We're meant to see it as the 'Christmas cracker joke' of comedy, something to amuse, to tickle, certainly not to offend – and if we are offended by the glaring discrepancy between 'Office stud' and 'Office slut' then we are the ones who can't take a joke.

Independent

Yet, even though the king evidently shares the philosopher's doubts about the religious doctrine of creation in six days and goes on to highlight his own skepticism about the possibility of divine-human contact in connection with it, he nevertheless points out a glaring discrepancy between the philosopher's theoretical account of prophecy and its prerequisites and actual experience.

SEP

In conclusion, the experiments revealed a glaring discrepancy between single cell cultures and complex brain tissue regarding the effect of different Aβ species on MTT reduction.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "glaring discrepancies", ensure the context clearly establishes what is being compared and why the differences are significant. Provide specific examples to support your claim.

Common error

While "glaring discrepancies" is a valid phrase, avoid using it too frequently in your writing. Vary your language by using synonyms such as "obvious inconsistencies" or "striking differences" to maintain reader engagement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "glaring discrepancies" functions as a noun phrase, where "glaring" serves as an adjective modifying the noun "discrepancies". According to Ludwig, it describes differences that are immediately obvious and striking. The phrase typically acts as the subject or object of a sentence.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "glaring discrepancies" is a grammatically sound and usable expression to point out obvious and significant inconsistencies. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. It is most commonly found in news, science, and formal business contexts. While not exceedingly common, it's a reliable phrase for emphasizing notable differences. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in defining what is being compared and why the differences matter. Alternatives like "obvious inconsistencies" or "striking differences" can be used to add variety to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious inconsistencies

Focuses on the lack of uniformity and how easily noticeable the differences are.

striking contradictions

Emphasizes the conflicting nature of the differences, suggesting a direct opposition.

palpable disparities

Highlights the tangible and easily perceived nature of the differences.

evident divergences

Stresses the clear and unmistakable nature of the deviations.

marked inconsistencies

Underscores the prominent and noticeable character of the inconsistencies.

conspicuous variances

Highlights the clear visibility and distinction of the variances.

noticeable disagreements

Focuses on the easily observed lack of agreement or alignment.

flagrant differences

Emphasizes the shocking and openly obvious nature of the differences.

blatant contradictions

Stresses the offensively obvious nature of the contradictory elements.

prominent variations

Highlights the outstanding and easily seen deviations.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "glaring discrepancies" in a sentence?

To effectively use "glaring discrepancies", clearly identify the items being compared and explain why their differences are noteworthy. For example: "There were "obvious inconsistencies" in the witness testimonies, which raised doubts about the accuracy of their accounts."

What are some alternatives to using "glaring discrepancies"?

You can use alternatives such as "obvious inconsistencies", "striking contradictions", or "palpable disparities" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "glaring discrepancies"?

It is appropriate to use "glaring discrepancies" when you want to emphasize that differences or inconsistencies are easily noticeable and significant. This phrase works well in contexts where accuracy and consistency are expected.

What's the difference between "glaring discrepancies" and "minor differences"?

"Glaring discrepancies" refers to significant and obvious inconsistencies, whereas "minor differences" implies small and relatively unimportant variations. The choice depends on the magnitude and impact of the differences you are describing. You could use "insignificant variations" or "negligible differences" instead of minor differences.