"given these premises" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you have established a set of facts on which to base an opinion or decision. For example: "Given these premises, it is clear that the most advantageous plan of action is to pursue a career in medicine."
Given these premises, exploring the determinants of service utilisation is central to identifying the causes of inequalities in health and health care.
Given these premises, we felt that the addition of a paragraph on the very limited data available on MOH in Latin American countries (even if partly coming from a preliminary, unpublished report) would be useful to draw attention on the issue and to spur further research on the topic.
Given these premises, guaranteeing human subjects protection is mandatory for authors, editors and publishers, firstly because "the health of my patient will be my first consideration" (from the World Medical Association Declaration of Geneva [1]), but also because biomedical publishing is not exempt from possible litigation.
Given these premises, it seems indeed reasonable to postulate that in addition to the main role of Comm in sorting Robo, a further finer mechanism could exist silencing the residual repulsive activity of the receptor escaped from the sorting process.
Given these premises, AID and its functions should be investigated not much as a source of AD pathology, but as a possible interesting intracellular signaling pathway, much similar to NOTCH and NICD, that is still obscure but highly likely to be effective in neurons, possibly under stressing conditions.
Given these premises, one could expect rodent-based studies to be at the forefront of vision research, but, historically, this has not been the case.
Given these restricted premises, laboratory instructors with experience of teaching developed a short but large-scale EIP regarding pre-analytical practices including a specific lecture of VBSC guideline practices.
Thus, given Barbara as axiomatic, and given the premises of the reducible syllogism, the contradictory of its conclusion is false, so the original conclusion is true.
That is, the KS argument shows that (given the premises) a spin 1 particle cannot possess all the properties at once which it displays in different measurement arrangements.
So given the premises of (10), adding 'every S is D' would lead to contradiction: every S is P, and not every S is P.
Given the premises, both of which are supported by plenty of evidence, the conclusion follows inexorably.
