Sentence examples for given the substantial differences from inspiring English sources
On balance, the agreement in turbine wake predictions for these test cases is very encouraging given the substantial differences in physical modeling fidelity and computer resources required.
Given the substantial differences in the outcomes between stable and unstable slips we have chosen to study them separately, conducting two systematic reviews and patient level analysis.
In other words, given the substantial differences in sources of income, it could be expected that trade liberalization and the world price surges will have different income and welfare impacts depending on how factor prices are affected.
However, given the substantial differences in context, their results are not generalizable to South Asians living in industrialized countries [ 64].
However, given the substantial differences between the outcomes of immune response and programmed cell death for host, we adhere to the threefold classification of defense strategies for the purpose of the present analysis.
Given the substantial differences found between ITT and PP results in our study (with better results for PP), we may expect that with more patients completing their treatment, this would result in higher effect sizes.
Given the substantial difference in buried surface and number of interactions at the interfaces, it seems energetically unfavorable for AZ1 to first break the ODC homodimer and then form the ODC-AZ1 heterodimer.
A further limitation is that we did we did not assess mortality between groups; several deaths will inevitably have occurred among patients lost to follow-up [12], and given the substantial difference in follow-up rates between groups, we considered that any mortality estimate would likely be subject to substantial bias due to misclassification of mortality among patients lost to follow up.
Given the substantial difference in prognosis, routine assessment of HPV status should be mandated in clinical practice.
Given the substantial difference between the association in the earlier and later data (ORs of 2.7 vs. 1.4), and its marginal statistical significance, we recommend interpreting this result with caution.
