given the expense of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "given the expense of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing costs or financial considerations related to a specific situation or decision. Example: "Given the expense of the project, we need to reconsider our budget allocation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

44 human-written examples

Given the expense of foodstuffs in Reykjavík, where so much is imported, this was a large gesture.

The New Yorker

But given the expense of graduate degrees, shouldn't there be some significant adjustment by professors in the way they teach?

The New York Times

Given the expense of gum removal and the entrenched habits of gum chewers, is cleanup worth it?

The New York Times

Given the expense of gear, licences, travel etc, the vast majority of hunting is clearly not motivated by economic need.

The Guardian - Sport

Veteran theater producers estimate that given the expense of the set and the size of the cast, crew, and orchestra, weekly costs are in excess of $600,000.

The New York Times

"Given the expense of making this sort of film, Toho will have to appeal to older audiences as well," said Schilling.

The Guardian - Film

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

14 human-written examples

Given the expenses of "Spider-Man," Broadway professionals like Tom Viertel, a producer who won Tony Awards for "Hairspray" and "The Producers," said it was difficult to see how this musical ever makes money, unless its offshoot productions are very innovative.

The New York Times

Until now, Gawker Media has been funding the Hulk Hogan legal expenses from general revenues and given the expenses of continuing to defend our First Amendment rights, the management of Gawker Media has concluded that additional financing should be locked in before the trial begins.

TechCrunch

This regulatory obstacle may temper the enthusiasm of pharmaceutical companies to pursue development, given the expense and risk of clinical trials.

BioMed Research International

This is a critical issue, given the expense and intrusiveness of these therapies, and the fact that as many as 30% of patients do not respond to their first TNF inhibitor [ 14].

Genome Medicine

Given the expense, complexity and delicacy of doing it with humans, they opted instead for rabbits.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "given the expense of", ensure that the expense is clearly defined and relevant to the decision or situation being discussed. This adds clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "given the expense of" without explicitly mentioning what the expense refers to. Be clear and specific to maintain clarity and avoid reader confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "given the expense of" functions as a prepositional phrase that introduces a condition or reason based on financial cost. Ludwig examples show its use in explaining decisions, justifying actions, or presenting constraints due to financial considerations. As Ludwig AI says, is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

32%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "given the expense of" is a versatile and frequently used prepositional phrase that introduces a rationale based on cost considerations. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English. It's common in news, science, and formal business contexts, providing a justification or explanation for decisions and actions. When employing this phrase, clarity is key: ensure the specific expense is well-defined. Alternatives include "considering the cost of" and "in light of the expenses for". Keep in mind that while "given the expenses of" is also grammatically correct, "given the expense of" is more suitable for referring to a singular, overarching cost.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

considering the cost of

Focuses specifically on the financial aspect, replacing "expense" with "cost".

in light of the expenses for

Rephrases the opening to highlight the context of considering expenses.

taking into account the cost of

Emphasizes a deliberate consideration of the expense.

considering the financial burden of

Highlights the negative aspect of "expense" as a burden.

bearing in mind the price of

Uses "price" instead of "expense" and "bearing in mind" for consideration.

recognizing the outlay required for

Employs more formal terms like "outlay" and "required" to indicate the expense.

with regard to the expenditure on

Uses "expenditure" to specify the financial spending and "with regard to" to introduce the consideration.

in view of the investment in

Highlights the financial aspect of investment instead of expense.

given the economic implications of

Focuses more broadly on economic implications rather than just expense.

understanding the monetary commitment for

Replaces "expense" with "monetary commitment" to emphasize financial dedication.

FAQs

How can I use "given the expense of" in a sentence?

You can use "given the expense of" to introduce a reason or condition based on financial cost. For instance, "given the expense of the project, we need to reconsider our budget".

What are some alternatives to saying "given the expense of"?

Alternatives include "considering the cost of", "taking into account the price of", or "in light of the expenses for", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "given the expenses of" instead of "given the expense of"?

While "given the expenses of" is grammatically correct and acceptable, "given the expense of" is more common when referring to a singular, overarching cost. The choice depends on whether you are referring to a single itemized expense or a general consideration of expenses.

What's the difference between "given the expense of" and "due to the expense of"?

"Given the expense of" introduces a factor to be considered, while "due to the expense of" indicates direct causation. For example, "given the expense of renovations, we might delay" suggests consideration, whereas "due to the expense of renovations, we cannot proceed" implies a direct consequence.