The phrase "given proper notice" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that a specific action or event will occur if a person is notified in advance. It is often seen in legal documents or formal letters. Example: "The landlord has the right to enter the property, given proper notice of at least 24 hours."
But if Mr. Cortes is given proper notice, he is happy to please.
None had been given proper notice of the suit, and several said that they learned of it only after 5 p.m. on Wednesday, the day before Thanksgiving.
The industry and the senators further argued that the poultry plants were not given proper notice that workers should be compensated for donning and doffing time.
In a 4-to-1 ruling, the court said DuPont had not been given proper notice that the residents were seeking an injunction.
The suit, filed yesterday by Assemblyman Vito J. Lopez and community groups, argued that KeySpan had not given proper notice to the community or responded to concerns about health and safety problems.
They also say that the team was not given proper notice before being withdrawn from the tournaments, and that by taking such action Georgia breached the terms of the players' scholarships.
Someone reliable who isn't going to run off to India without giving proper notice or drop it all for some exciting job," she begins to cry.
My apartment is not rent-stabilized, but there must be some sort of protection for a tenant when a sponsor does not give proper notice...
"Unless the judge orders them to reopen the firehouse and give proper notice this is absolutely nothing more than a paper victory".
The judge, James G. Starkey of State Supreme Court, ruled that the Bloomberg administration had failed to give proper notice to a Manhattan community board that it planned to close an engine company in Queens that serves as a backup for Roosevelt Island.
The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has broadly agreed with the federal bankruptcy court in New York that a certain type of bankruptcy asset sale can bar successor liability claims, but disagreed with the bankruptcy judge's "no harm, no foul" analysis in the specific case of General Motors and its failure to give proper notice to some potential creditors.
