Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Integrated data after base-line-correction and fitting to the respective binding isotherms to a single-site binding model are given (lower panel).
Similar(59)
Police give lower figures.
The insert given in the lower panel shows two analog tracings that represent flow-derived (top) and integrated volume-derived (bottom) changes, respectively.
This profile is given in the lower panel of Figure 5 and displays the In/P concentration ratio and the Cr atomic fraction as a function of distance along the cylinder with increments of 0.5 nm.
The source range in the low-band is patched, in this example, to region A and B. The frequency plot of the patched signals in these regions are given in the lower panel of Figure 10.
Accession numbers are given in the lower panel.
The most stark illustration of the difference between methods is given in the lower panels, where parametric imputation seems to do a very poor job of preserving the association in observed data but PMM and LRD do well by contrast.
The upper panel gives the results for a spheroid modeled using N = 6041 subunits of edge length d = 1.405 nm; the lower panel gives the results for N = 24679 subunits of edge length d = 0.879 nm.
The IK Google search gives only three matches (lower panel).
HSim and ODE simulations gave comparable curves (Fig. 4A, lower panel and Supplementary Fig. S1).
The lower panel, in Figure 7D, gives the profiles of selected GO terms and KEGG pathways, overlaying the modularity gray background, to guide the eye.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com