Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
give source for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "give source for" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be used in contexts where you are requesting someone to provide a reference or citation for information. Example: "Please give source for the statistics you mentioned in your report."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Give source for DNase data.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
The authors do not develop this large and crucial statement, or even give sources for it, despite their meticulous pedantry in all unimportant matters.
News & Media
As an author of nonfiction books, I understand it is my responsibility to give sources for my information.
News & Media
Additional file 1 gives further details about our modelling approach for interested readers and to allow completion of the CHEERS checklist [ 20] in Additional file 2. Additional file 3: Tables S1 and S2 detail and give sources for the model parameters of the diagnostic and management components respectively.
Science
Moreover, an algorithm has been developed to find a route for a given source and destination pair in this newly designed DMFB.
Science
The numerical results clearly exhibit the distortion and symmetry of second-harmonic field pattern for a given source of excitation.
Eliot did at times give sources but was laughed at for pretentiousness.
News & Media
They give sources sharing secrets and information for the public good the protection they need.
News & Media
For the given source strength the collimator designs for both source and detectors were optimized to get the maximum number of counts with the least scattering effects.
Science
Next, the algorithm WidestShortestPath is executed on (EG) for a given (source - dest) pair.
Our objective is to construct a route with high throughput capacity for a given source and destination pair.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use more formal alternatives like "provide the source for" or "cite the source" to maintain professionalism in academic and formal writing.
Common error
Do not use the phrase "give source for" in formal contexts. It's better to opt for a more structured request like "provide a citation for" to maintain clarity and professionalism.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "give source for" functions as a request for a citation or reference. As Ludwig AI points out, it is not grammatically correct. The correct usage would involve a more formal verb like "provide" or "cite".
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
33%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "give source for" may be understood in some contexts, it is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. Ludwig AI's analysis indicates that more precise alternatives like "provide the source for" or "cite the origin of" are preferable for maintaining clarity and professionalism. The phrase is rarely used, and formal settings require using more formal verbs to maintain clarity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
provide the source for
Replaces "give" with a more formal verb, enhancing clarity and professionalism.
cite the origin of
Focuses on the beginning or derivation of something, implying a need for specific origins.
reference the data for
Emphasizes the need for data references, useful in scientific or academic contexts.
indicate the basis for
Asks for the foundational evidence or reasoning behind a statement or claim.
specify the grounds for
Requests detailed justification or reasons, suitable for legal or argumentative contexts.
document the evidence for
Highlights the need for documented proof, typically in research or investigative settings.
identify the authority for
Seeks to pinpoint the credible source backing a statement, relevant in debates or analyses.
attribute the information to
Asks to assign the information back to its original source, emphasizing proper credit.
quote the study for
Demands a direct quotation from the relevant study or research to support a claim.
name the publication for
Requests the title of the published work where the information can be verified.
FAQs
What is a more formal way to ask for a source?
Instead of saying "give source for", use phrases like "provide the source for" or "cite the source of" for a more professional tone.
Is "give source for" grammatically correct?
No, "give source for" is not considered grammatically correct in formal English. It's better to use alternatives like "provide source for" or "indicate the source of".
When is it appropriate to use "give source for"?
While "give source for" might be understood in informal contexts, it's advisable to use more precise and grammatically correct phrases like "cite the origin of" or "reference the data for" in formal writing.
Which is correct, "give source for" or "provide the source for"?
"Provide the source for" is the correct and more formal option. "Give source for" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in academic or professional writing.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested