Sentence examples for gis were found from inspiring English sources

Neighbourhood statistics, coupled to a GIS, were found to be an effective way of quantifying and visualizing spatial variation in environmental geochemistry.

Note: Rows represent 37 different genomic locations where GIs were found in at least one strain.

In addition to the mobile elements, the GIs were found to be rich in metabolism and biosynthesis-related genes.

In Alphaproteobacteria, GIs were found in SAR11 (Candidatus Pelagibacter ubique strain HTCC1062) referred to as hypervariable regions in the original study [ 27].

The GIs were found to harbour a novel gene coding for the zonular occluden toxin family protein (zot), that is convergently oriented with respect to its flanking genes coding for a conserved domain protein and bacterial Type II and III secretion proteins respectively, suggesting their involvement in the transportation of Zot toxin into the host intestine.

Sonohysterography (SHG; also called saline infusion sonography (SIS) or gel infusion sonography (GIS)) was found to be as effective as HSG, with both reported to have a sensitivity of 75% and positive predictive value of 43% for SHG or SIS/GIS and 50% for HSG, compared with hysteroscopy [10, 13].

GIS assignments were found to be geospatial, technology mediated, subject free, and unique in requirements.

Moreover, this study yielded results similar to that of a study conducted by O'Bryant and colleagues [ 22], where higher levels of long-term low-levels of GIS-estimated arsenic were found to be associated with reduced language, visuospatial, and executive functioning; however, O'Bryant and colleagues did not study other aspects of cognitive functioning.

When the total sample was analyzed by AS3MT genotype (AA, AG, GG), higher current GIS-estimated groundwater arsenic exposure were found to differentially impact performance on tasks of cognitive functioning.

Several GIS-based time-invariant spatial covariates were found to be important predictors in the 1999 2007 Pmodelmodel, including: elevation, urbanized land use within 1 km, county-level population density, distance to nearest A1, A2, and A3 roads, and point-source emissions density within 7.5 km.

No significant differences were found between providers on the primary outcome measure, IBS-GIS (p = .57 at midpoint, and p = .51 at endpoint).