get things starts

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "get things starts" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "get things started"? You can use "get things started" when you want to indicate the initiation of an activity or process. Example: "Let's get things started with a brief introduction before we dive into the main topics."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

To get things starts Steve Zeitchik took a look at the influx of race-themed films in this year's festival, including "Moonlight," "A United Kingdom," "The Birth of a Nation," "Loving" and more, and what that means for the industry and audiences alike.

Los Angeles Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

That might get things started.

The New York Times - Magazine

"This at least will get things started".

The Guardian

That might work — at least to get things started.

The New York Times

Jena Friedman will get things started, and Chris Lamberth will host.

The New York Times - Arts

"There is enough planned to get things started," she said.

The New York Times

The Netscape white paper in August 1996 helped get things started.

The New York Times

Just post yours below to get things started.

The Guardian

To get things started, though, I get a big punch bowl ready.

The New York Times

We'll get things started with this suggestion from an editor: "Remake the Catskills?

The New York Times

"But 12 years ago I put my stake in the ground on Memorial Day to get things started".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct form, "get things started", to ensure grammatical accuracy and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using the present tense "starts" after "get things". The correct form is the past participle "started".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "get things starts" is intended to function as a verb phrase, aimed at expressing the initiation of an action or process. However, it is grammatically incorrect as it uses the present tense form 'starts' instead of the past participle 'started'. According to Ludwig, the correct form is 'get things started'.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "get things starts" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "get things started". While it appears rarely, primarily in "News & Media", it's crucial to use the accurate form to maintain clarity and credibility in writing. As noted by Ludwig, using the past participle "started" is essential for grammatical correctness. Alternatives like "kick things off" or "begin the process" can also be used depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

get things started

Corrects the grammatical error in the original phrase by using the past participle "started".

kick things off

Uses an informal idiom to mean begin or initiate something.

begin the process

A straightforward and neutral way to describe starting a process.

set the ball rolling

An idiomatic expression for starting an activity or process.

get the ball rolling

An idiomatic expression for beginning an activity or process, similar to "set the ball rolling".

start the ball rolling

An idiomatic way to describe initiating an action, project, or activity.

initiate proceedings

A more formal way to say start a formal process or event.

commence operations

Suggests a more formal and structured beginning, often used in business or technical contexts.

spark the process

Implies starting something with energy or enthusiasm.

trigger the beginning

Suggests starting something with a catalyst or initiating event.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "get things starts"?

The correct phrase is "get things started". The word "started" should be in the past participle form.

Are there any alternatives to "get things started"?

Yes, you can use phrases like "kick things off", "begin the process", or "set the ball rolling".

Is "get things starts" ever correct in English?

No, "get things starts" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct form is always "get things started".

What's the difference between "get things starts" and "get things started"?

"Get things starts" is grammatically incorrect, while "get things started" is the correct way to express the initiation of an activity or process.