Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
"Do you find it hard to get started on a task that needs to be done?" "Do you bite your fingernails or chew the end of your pencil?" "Would you 'buy on credit' with the hope that you can keep up the payments?" All a "yes" from me, I'm afraid.
Similar(59)
Getting started on a degree is simple.
He was an architect, just getting started on a career.
The PSI accounted for a considerable proportion of the variance of teacher reports on the FTF item "difficulty getting started on a task/activity".
The highest number of children was found in the group reported with a "somewhat true" answer on the FTF item "difficulty getting started on a task/activity".
The two hypoactivity items, "appears slow, sluggish or lacking energy" and "difficulty getting started on a task/activity" from the FTF questionnaire were only included in the teacher version.
The responses "somewhat true" or "certainly true" had a lower frequency on the FTF item "appears to be slow, sluggish or lacking energy" (9.8 and 2.7%, respectively) than on the FTF item "difficulty getting started on a task/activity" (25.1 and 10.2%, respectively).
This was only true for the FTF item "difficulty getting started on a task/activity", however, the conclusion should be modified by the fact that very few children (n = 7) were rated with a "certainly true" report on the "appears to be slow, sluggish or lacking energy" item.
The risk was increased both when teachers reported "certainly true" on the FTF item "appears to be slow, sluggish or lacking energy" [OR = 1.48 (CI = 0.614 3.55)] and on the FTF item "difficulty getting started on a task/activity" [OR = 2.02 (CI = 1.33 3.06)].
Teachers of all children were asked to complete a questionnaire including two items from the Five to Fifteen (FTF) questionnaire [ 9] ("appears slow, sluggish and lacking energy" and "difficulty getting started on a task/activity") which are part of the hypoactivity symptom domain of FTF.
It describes getting started on a walking program and different rates and ways of walking.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com