Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig'get start' is not correct and usable in written English
The correct form is 'get started'. You can use this phrase to encourage someone to start a task or activity. For example, "Let's get started on the project so that we can finish it by tomorrow."
Exact(11)
"Are you going to get Start done?" the Russian president asked, according to an administration official, who like others interviewed insisted on anonymity to share private moments.
It's only a fortnight since the Kickstarter campaign ended, so not much has happened yet: people who paid for the developer packages will get prototype devices in July so they can start making apps that work with The Dash, but regular pledgers will get start getting theirs in November if Bragi hits its deadlines.
The opening ceremony at the Fisht Stadium gets underway at 16:00 GMT with action due to get start on Saturday.
Wanna challenge you brain!! OK! Let's get start with mirror blocks!! OK! $29.00 order now smooth rotation and weight!
Homes built in the 1970s, which are about as old as they get, start at $325,000 and need work, but new log cabins, with 5,000 square feet and five acres, go for $2 million.
New users would eventually decline and, if the products didn't get start to become genuinely sexy, then they would eventually stall.
Similar(48)
A venture capitalist points us to free places to get start-up money from the government.
You don't get start-to-finish enchantment, but that's not a function of insufficient coddling.
"They will no longer be able to get start-up grants from their local council and will have to find other sources, such as payroll giving and legacy donations".
This will do "semi-custom manufacturing" of new firms, aiming to get start-ups to the next round of financing within three months instead of the traditional 12-18 months, says Rob Adams, head of AV Labs.Yet few of the new incubators have experienced venture capitalists in charge.
Better get started.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com