Sentence examples for genuine publication from inspiring English sources

With a view to disentangling genuine publication biases from other causes of funnel asymmetry, the funnel plot can be enhanced by including contours that partition it into areas of statistical significance and non-significance 11 16 based on the standard Wald test, marking traditionally perceived milestones of significance for example, the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels.

No judge will grant an injunction where there is a genuine public interest in publication.

The analysis were repeated on categories according to our histological findings (Liebrechts-Akkerman et al., submitted for publication): genuine SIDS, no findings that might have had an influences on survival; SIDS with minor infections, e.g. laryngitis, urine bladder infection, etc.; SIDS+, a non-infectious disease that might have contributed to death; major infection SIDS, e.g. bronchopneumonia.

All analyses were first repeated on two of the four histological subgroups previously defined (Liebrechts-Akkerman et al., submitted for publication): genuine SIDS (no findings that had any influences on survival, n = 100) and minor infections (e.g. laryngitis, urinary bladder infection, etc., n = 28) (Tables  4 and 5).

It adds: "Publication and genuine transparency is the standard: there is a presumption in favour of publication".

Authors would also know that publication would provide genuine scrutiny, not routinely provided or even intended by prepublication peer review.

Although this may not be a genuine form of open-access publication, this is a healthy trend which should be continued and fostered for wider dissemination of knowledge.

In the course of our work we identified a straightforward technical problem that produces an artefact that has been repeatedly mistaken for genuine results, leading to the publication of incorrect conclusions.

We conclude that the placebo response rate in controlled clinical trials is not due to methodological artifacts, to disease history alone or to circumstantial characteristics of studies, but seems to reflect a genuine improvement, unless one invokes publication bias for all negative studies.

And some publications just make genuine mistakes because they know nothing about the topic and garble the data.

But their genuine scientific discussion has, since the publication of the emails online, been hijacked by ignorant or malicious invective.