Exact(60)
Individuals were removed for low genotyping success rate (<90%).
The genotyping success rate for each SNP was >98%.
The genotyping success rates ranged from 99.5% to 100%.
The genotyping success rate for each variant included in the analysis was >90%, with an average genotyping success of 95.3%.
The overall genotyping success rates were >96% for all variants except for CDC123/CAMK1D where a 90% genotyping success rate was obtained.
The genotyping success was above 99% and only samples genotyped for both markers were used.
Genotyping success rate was >99.29% (two missing data, one man and one woman).
Genotyping success rate was above 98% and both SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Genotyping success rates were 97.4% and 95.8%, and the MAF were 41.5% and 25.2%, respectively.
The genotyping success rates of the four SNPs ranged from 96.3% to 98.7%.
The genotyping success rate was ≥95% for all SNPs at each genotyping center.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com