Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
SLC16A9, encoding monocarboxylate transporter 9 (MCT9), was identified purely from analysis of human genomic expressed sequence tag (EST) databases [ 65].
Additionally, some mRNAs may cross-hybridize probes in the array that are designed to detect another mRNA, or probes that are designed to detect the mRNA of a particular gene may be relying on genomic expressed sequence tag (EST) information that is incorrectly associated with that gene.
It is known that both ATLL and PTCL, NOS with genomic aberrations express CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 4, while PTCL, NOS without genomic aberrations expresses CCR3.
Thus, this paper breaks little new ground, though it does point out that many genomic regions express both sense and antisense transcripts, and each of these can affect miRNA availability.
A number of resources are required to support the assembly and annotation of the CHO genome including physical maps, genomic sequences, expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences, and proteomic data.
Analysis of genomic and expressed sequences, either cDNAs or expressed sequence tags (ESTs) for CPNE1 and RBM12, confirmed the conservation of this phenomenon during evolutionary courses.
In one case, the L. polyedrum peridinin-chlorophyll a-protein gene, only one absolutely identical tandemly repeated sequence is present in the genome with thousands of copies, based both on genomic and expressed versions of this gene [15].
These databases contain diverse information, such as genomic data, expressed sequence tags [ 24] and microarray expression data.
We analyzed a total of 3485 DNA sequences including genomic and expressed sequences (ESTs) of mulberry (Morus alba L). genome.
Sequence differences are indicated by letters (e.g., let-7a and -7b), while different genomic loci expressing the same sequence are indicated by numbers.
They are discovered from genomic or expressed sequence tag sequences available in databases or through sequencing of candidate genes, PCR products, or even whole genomes (Varshney et al. 2005; Zhu and Salmeron 2007).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com