Sentence examples for genes were caused from inspiring English sources

Irisarri et al. [ 38] concluded that the accelerated substitution rates in protein-coding genes were caused by a relaxation of purifying selection in the ancestral lineage of neobatrachians.

Among these genes, 797, 1,351, and 562 genes were caused by the cis only, trans only, and CT effects, respectively (fig. 6 A and B).

The analysis of expression levels of human islet tissue for T2D showed that the variances of expression levels of the genes were caused by the aberrant DNA methylation and the intensities of chromatin modifications.

Although we reexamined the partial or duplicated OR genes with respect to assembly issues such as locations in the contigs and relationship between individual members of identical duplicates, we did not find any logical evidences to support that a part of partial or duplicated OR genes were caused by assembly errors.

To check whether the substitution rate differences of the mt protein-coding genes were caused by relaxed selective pressure and also to specify in which lineages the selective pressure had changed, we compared 19 branch models having distinct dN/dS ratios on designated branches of the best neobatrachian topology (Table  2).

These findings suggest that the alterations in expression after demethylation observed for these 18 genes were caused either by (a) methylation of other in cis regulatory regions or (b) that expression of these genes might be regulated by genes that were epigenetically inactivated.

Hence, if these other genes were causing the respective eQTL, all causal genes in Qrr1 would be affected in cis.

It was an early example of an epigenetic phenomenon, whereby changes in the expression of genes are caused not by alterations in the DNA itself but by non-genetic factors.

The deregulation of these genes is caused by similar histological changes in the studied tissues.

The hypothesis that the common set of genes was caused by pure chance was clearly rejected (P-value = 1.07·10-42) [ 12].

Thus, it is most likely that the duplication of both genes was caused by a single event.