Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The mutations may also explain why some genes have much different expression levels than would be expected between humans and chimps.
This result indicates that antisense genes have much less impact on IPACs.
Ubiquitously expressed genes have much higher germline expression level than narrowly expressed somatic genes with the consideration of ectopical expression[ 18].
Comparison of sex-biased gene turnover rates confirmed previous findings that, in D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura, male-biased genes have much higher turnover rates than female-biased genes (for n = 2 and n = 4).
Similar(56)
Prediction tests showed that the prognostic gene sets with a total of 576 genes had much poorer prognostic power than the 23 genes, failed in 3 of 5 glioma cohorts (Table S21).
Downstream gene analysis revealed that a number of genes had much higher expression in the GmGT-2B-transgenic plants than that in the GmGT-2A-transgenic plants (Fig. 7), and these genes may contribute to the reduced ABA sensitivity in the GmGT-2B-transgenic GmGT-2B-transgenic GmGT-2B-transgenic
Because the "allele frequencies" were called at the RNA level, highly expressed genes had much lower p-values.
Overall, the most highly expressed Obp genes had much higher expression levels (2 3 orders of magnitude) than the most highly expressed Or or Snmp genes (Additional file 6).
Four subfamilies (STP, pGlcT, INT and PLT) showed a pattern in which one or a few genes had much higher representation in the EST database than any of the remaining expressed genes.
The PGL genes had much lower nucleotide diversity, which was especially evident in SDHB, suggesting that the SDHB gene product might be under functional constraints that preclude the accumulation of variants.
Most genes (about 86%) were connected to not more than five diseases, whereas other genes had much higher numbers of associations, up to the extreme of 78 links (about 21% of the 375 diseases) to tumor necrosis factor (TNF).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com