FCCP significantly decreased ROS formation by 45.2 ± 3.9%% (control vs. control FCCP; n = 10, p < 0.05), whereas ROS generation did not differ between the different treatment groups (Fig. 5e, f).
First, among Turkish women the first generation did not differ from ethnic Dutch women, while second generation Turkish women smoked much more.
In addition, we found a reversed trend among Turkish women regarding smoking: the second generation smoked significantly more, while the first generation did not differ from ethnic Dutch.
Some groups showed a trend in opposite direction: Turkish women of second generation smoked significantly more than ethnic Dutch women, while the first generation did not differ from ethnic Dutch.
The timing of peak vertical force generation did not differ between seasons (t = 0.135, df = 7, P = 0.9) occurring at 48±3 ms and 49.1±10 ms after the start of the jump during summer and winter, respectively (Figs 2 and 3).
After 2000 generations H2l2000 did not differ significantly from H2l1000 and remained significantly greater than L2l (p = 0.001).
Mediterranean immigrant women were more likely to separate over generations, whereas Caribbean immigrant and second generation women did not differ.
Although first-generation students did not differ in how they responded to survey questions versus continuing-generation students, they could still differ in how valuable the changes in the course were to them.
However, preliminary analyses showed that generation interval did not differ markedly between schemes.
Another study has shown that second-generation immigrant children did not differ from the non-immigrant children in their own presentation of mental health at the age of 12 [ 18].
Further after 2000 generations of selection H1l2000 did not differ significantly from H1l1000 but the difference between H1l and H1h became non-significant.
