Sentence examples for generation of size from inspiring English sources

These estimates can be used to determine the extent to which the relative growth and body size of individuals varies over time, providing important insight into mechanisms responsible for the generation of size distributions.

Spatial or aspatial indices of competition (e.g. Lorimer, 1983; Tome and Burkhardt, 1989; Holmes and Reed, 1991; Biging and Dobbertin, 1992, 1995) are the dominant mechanism for generation of size hierarchy in many tree growth models.

A first admixed generation of size N is formed by randomly drawing N pairs of parents with replacement and randomly drawing one gamete from each parent to form N diploid offspring.

Overall, we ask whether an evolutionary response to environmental change is likely to act through body size/growth processes, and to what extent early size differences, later growth rate variation, and size-selective mortality contribute to the generation of size distributions.

It is important to note that modern particle size metrology is largely a science of approximation wherein the generation of size distributions necessitates the inclusion of assumptions and fitting parameters that are not necessarily consistent from manufacturer to manufacturer or even within the same instrument under different analysis modes or parameters.

While reproductive investment increased in response to selection for small body size in our experiment, we saw little differentiation in the maturation schedule (represented by the probabilistic maturation reaction norm, PMRN; Heino et al. 2002; Dieckmann and Heino 2007) between small- and large-selected zebrafish after five generation of size-selective harvesting.

Fly body sizes increased by 15% during 11 generations of size selection in 21 and 40 kPa aPO2.

After five generations of size selection followed by three generations of no selection, the small-selected fish had evolved a significantly lower asymptotic length (L ∞ ) (27.4 ± 0.40 mm) compared to the other selection lines (random 29.2 ± 0.29 mm; large-selected 29.5 ± 0.59 mm; Fig. 2A, Table 1).

We examined the outcome of five generations of size-selective harvesting by comparing the phenotypes of individuals among selection treatments several generations after selection was halted.

We assessed a range of life-history, physiological, and behavioral traits expected to change in response to size selection after five generations of size-selective harvesting.

Our experimental approach in zebrafish demonstrated changes in genotypes, phenotypes, and population dynamics in response to just five generations of size-selective harvesting.