Sentence examples for generation exposure from inspiring English sources

Monitoring and maintenance include a series of tests that can be performed by different assigned people; they are directed to x-ray generation, exposure, detector performance, post-processing and viewing at a workstation.

The search for the relationships between external exposures and global profiles of molecular features in the same individuals constitutes a novel advancement towards the development of "next generation exposure assessment" for environmental chemicals and their mixtures.

I was personally fourth generation exposure.

An individual DMR required a statistically significant difference between the F3 generation control lineage versus F3 generation exposure lineage sperm (p < 10-5) [ 13– 13].

A statistical difference in DNA methylation between the F3 generation control lineage versus the F3 generation exposure lineage sperm used a p-value of p < 10-5 [ 13– 13].

These substances are an urgent concern for the health of future generations: exposure even at low levels during pregnancy is associated with newborn birth defects.

These two extreme positive risk ratios were, however, reported after what is commonly referred to as "third-generation exposure" to DES, when the mother herself had been exposed to DES prenatally.

The difference between the results obtained by the two models for studies of third-generation exposure to DES was reduced only slightly by excluding the study by Klip et al. (2002); the Mantel–Haenszel method yielded an estimate of 2.46 (95% CI, 0.91 6.67) and the DerSimonian Laird method of 2.18 (95% CI, 0.64 7.46).

Excluding third-generation exposure from the DES subset yielded estimates of 2.02 (95% CI, 1.12 3.65) by the Mantel–Haenszel method and 2.00 (95% CI, 0.97 4.15) by the DerSimonian Laird method, on the basis of two studies investigating exposure to any estrogenic drug during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Excluding the studies of third-generation exposure to DES, values for the summary estimate of effect were found to be 1.33 (95% CI, 0.63 2.83) by the Mantel–Haenszel method and 1.31 (95% CI, 0.52 3.26) by the DerSimonian Laird method, a very modest and nonsignificant increase in risk.

Previous generations' exposures would be useful information to have, according to Hunt.