Sentence examples for generated significant differences from inspiring English sources

In Experiment 1, using a between-participants design, we isolated a classroom episode that, compared with the other episodes, generated significant differences in inhibitory function in a consequent Go/NoGo task.

All of the fluorescence generated significant differences between perfectly matched probe signal and mismatched probes (Fig.  2b).

According to the results, the LFTS generated significant difference in colorization after 6 h of digestion of the substrate peptide by 20 pg/mL BoNT/A-spiked PBS solution and the red signal in test line disappeared completely after 12 h of incubation (Fig. 4).

The use of standard units of measurement as well as the consideration of partakers in meals and of seasonality generates significant differences in the survey results.

This fact probes that slight modifications on the drug's design may generate significant differences in the final antitumour activity by modifying the DNA drug adducts, performance of resistance mechanisms and all the factors that play a fundamental role in Pt complexes' cytotoxicity.

But trying to get more specific or precise than this generates significant differences for how to conceptualize theories.

In this case, load management does not generate significant differences, mainly because the unmanaged demand from EVs is covered by PHES during peak hours.

Therefore, considering the fact that the treatments with applications of the CSB consortium did not generate significant differences in the evaluated parameters for the treatments with the addition of uninoculated LRC, it was not possible to confirm that the observed changes in the EM properties were completely influenced by the CSB activity on the LRC.

However, this difference seems not to be sufficient to generate significant differences in subject's reaction times according to the chromatic contrast between the two cues [18].

This analysis showed that the datasets generated using the 27F and 534R primers did not generate significant differences in microbial diversity at 97, 95, and 90% OTU definition (P>0.05; p = 0.10, R = −0.229 at 97% similarity level; p = 0.179, R = 0.083 at 95% similarity; p = 0.001, R = 0.396 at 90% similarity).

Using these seascape configuration metrics, patch reefs were clustered into two groups (hereafter called Fish Type I and Fish Type II for simplicity), which was sufficient to generate significant differences between groups for each seascape metric (Fig. 2A; ANOVA; P<0.05) and enabled maximum sample sizes within a group for subsequent analyses of reserve effects.