Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Generally in studies supporting the use of 3-option items, there is a marked tendency for researchers to cite the savings and other benefits which can be achieved by reducing tests to 3-option items.
Learner e-readiness has been investigated generally in studies like Smith (2005), Watkins et al. (2004), Palmer and Holt (2009), Hung et al. (2010), Xiong et al. (2015) or across specific disciplines such as nursing (Chong et al. 2011), mathematics (Chiou et al. 2010), and engineering (Akaslan and Law 2011).
Generally, in studies that involve multiple examiners, a benchmark examiner is used as gold standard in calibration exercises [ 3, 17].
In our study, and generally in studies of older adults, participants who are lost to follow-up exhibit lower cognitive test scores than do those who complete follow-up (Euser et al. 2008).
A notable methodological weakness in this study and generally in studies on bereavement is the lack of a clear and distinct diagnosis and measure of pathological grief, which makes conclusions ambiguous to information bias and the lack of criterion validity.
The method of phylogenetically independent comparisons relies on relatively few assumptions [ 1- 3] and is frequently used in evolutionary biology, in particular in anthropology, comparative phylogenetics and, more generally, in studies that test evolutionary hypotheses [ 19- 22].
Similar(54)
For all these reasons, we would be very cautious in applying this method for metatranscriptomic studies and, more generally, in quantitative studies.
The variation in OPS and its relationship to tectonic process is more complex than generally considered in studies of these types of rocks.
The scientific quality of published clinical trials is generally poor in studies where compression devices have been assessed in the management of venous disease.
Positionspecific iterated BLAST PSIBLAST [39] has been generally used in studies on proteomics.
These are reasons that were not generally reported in studies done in HICs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com