Sentence examples for generality I from inspiring English sources

The OpenFlow forwarding model has received some criticisms regarding its generality, i.e. limited framing support.

Moreover, the relative effectiveness of learning by different work practices for innovation is contingent on the nature of knowledge, characterized by generality (i.e., high mobility/transferability) and visibility (i.e., tighter links between actions and outcomes).

We may assume that L to be unit spacelike vector field without loss of generality, i.e., g ˜ ( L, L ) = 1.

The doctrine of types is based upon the observation that universal quantification understood as full generality, i.e., when x ranges 'over the whole universe' does not make sense: when we state that ∀xφ(x) is true, we only claim the function φ(x) has the value 'true' for all arguments x for which it is meaningful.

Despite these fundamental differences in their conceptions of logic, Kant and Frege may have agreed that the most important defining characteristic of logic is its generality, i.e., the fact that it provides norms (rules, prescriptions) that are constitutive of thought.

Since ( S ( w ′ ) ∩ W 1 ) ∪ ( S ( w ′ ) ∩ W 2 ) = S ( W ′ ) ∩ ( W 1 ∪ W 2 ) ≠ ∅, we assume S ( w ′ ) ∩ W 1 ≠ ∅ without loss of generality, i.e., there exists x ∈ X such that x ∈ S ( w ′ ) ∩ W 1. It follows from the definition of w ′ that x ∈ S ( w 1 ), which contradicts the fact that S ( w 1 ) ∩ W 1 = ∅.

If (s=0) and (gamma =0), it is the Sobolev inequality, while in their full generalities, i.e., when (sin [0, 2]) and (gamma in (-infty, frac{ n-2)^2}{4})), they contain – afrac{ n-2itable change of functions—the Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg inequalities [11].

Without loss of generality, for i ≠ j, assume that a i i β i i − β i i b i i [ b i i − q ( B ) ] [ a i i − q ( A ) ] ≤ a j j β j j − β j j b j j [ b j j − q ( B ) ] [ a j j − q ( A ) ]. (2.4).

Without loss of generality, for i ≠ j, we assume that a i i b i i − s i ∑ k ≠ i b k i m k ≤ a j j b j j − s j ∑ l ≠ j b l j m l. (2.10).

Without loss of generality, F i can be written as F i = V r, i V r, i ⊥ A i X i Y i Z i U s, i H U s, i ⊥ H, i = 1, ⋯, K, (30).

"I watched it go, and thought of all the free-as-a-bird generalities I had taken for granted.