Sentence examples for general prioritization from inspiring English sources

Such a biblical and even dogmatic grounding was possible, I think, precisely because in the American landscape the specific cause of social reform was often more central to the self-definition of religious liberalism than the general prioritization of personal experience that came in with Schleiermacher.

The focus is on general prioritization techniques suitable to MBT test suites.

On the other hand, our focus is on general prioritization techniques, as defined by Rothermel et al. (2001), where modifications are not considered.

In order to analyze the performance of the techniques, observing the influence of the number of test cases that fail, we define the following variables: Independent variables and factors General prioritization techniques: Techniques defined in Section 1.

In summary, the rejection of every null hypothesis of equality is a strong evidence of the influence of the failure profiles over the performance of the general prioritization techniques.

This choice of levels is related to the actual distribution of real failures detected when testing the applications – these distribution allow us to examine different settings from few failures from a single fault to more than one fault and more failures; General prioritization techniques: Techniques defined in Section 1.

General test case prioritization - test case prioritization is applied any time in the software development process, even in the initial testing activities; Regression testing prioritization - test case prioritization techniques execute after a set of changes in the SUT.

Therefore, Rothermel et al. (2001) propose the following classification: General test case prioritization - test case prioritization is applied any time in the software development process, even in the initial testing activities; Regression testing prioritization - test case prioritization techniques execute after a set of changes in the SUT.

Generally, in the MBT context, we can find proposals to apply general test case prioritization from UML diagrams, such as: i) the technique proposed by Kundu et al. (2009) where sequence diagrams are used as input; and ii) the technique proposed by Sapna and Mohanty (2009) where activity diagrams are used as input.

In this paper, we focus on general test case prioritization.

Complementing the definition, we postulated the following research hypothesis: "The general test case prioritization techniques present different abilities to reveal failures, considering models with different structures".