Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(6)
As shown in Fig. 5, the top 30 genera in terms of abundance were clustered and plotted using R software.
The strain Rouxiella sp. DSM 100043 has been chosen for the production of glycolipids due to results in screening experiments, novelty of the genera in terms of biosurfactant production and the product portfolio revealed using functional staining in TLC.
The genus Symbiodinium has largely been recognized to be incongruent with other dinoflagellate genera in terms of genetic diversity.
The two best-scoring genera in terms of PAGs content were Acaryochloris and Shigella (22.5% and 17.9% of all the plasmids encoded proteins, respectively); in both cases PAGs enrichment was shown to be statistically significant.
Of these, Cortinarius and Russula are also two of the most abundantly available genera in terms of fully identified sequences in GenBank while Tomentella was found to be among the more poorly represented.
Although this might superficially suggest a reduced plasticity in sex determination mechanisms regulating hermaphroditic versus female development in Panagrolaimus versus other well-studied nematode genera, Panagrolaimus likely suffers more than the other genera in terms of taxon undersampling – our observations in PII are based on only four Panagrolaimus strains.
Similar(54)
The two genera also differ in terms of habitat preferences.
Thalictrum, a member of the subfamily Thalictroideae, is one of the most diverse genera of Ranunculaceae in terms of number of species and morphological variation [ 17].
Both genera showed significant variation in terms of the overall presence and absence of different phytochemicals.
However, the distribution of centrality scores shows that some genera are either diverse in terms of ITS sequence similarity or are in need of taxonomic revision (e.g. Candida, Cryptococcus).
Thus, after 5 days, the most identified genera in the control sample, in terms of frequency, were Saccharomyces (58%) followed by Cladosporium (22%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com