Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
*Information on gender is missing for 31 participants.
Similar(59)
The female gender was missing completely!
From the combined sample, it excluded one case whose gender was missing and came up with a final sample of 1960 Seoul residents.
Gender was missing for 1 US subject.
For 70 babies information about their gender was missing.
*Age was missing for 57 subjects; gender was missing for 48 subjects.
Information on gender was missing for one responding GP in the Norwegian study material.
344 patients were included in this study; 185 (53.8%) were women and 157 (45.6%) were men (gender was missing for 2 patients [0.6%]).
All participants were included in the analyses with the exception of 15 students in whom data regarding gender were missing (n = 1417).
More females (n = 307) than males (n = 133) were sampled, while the information of the gender was missing for 140 animals.
Age and gender were missing on 48% and 55% of the forms received at CMH laboratory while on 72% and 71% of the forms received at AFIP.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com