Exact(2)
In this study the results of two GDP samples were combined.
To ascertain if P. aeruginosa EF-Tu was purified bound to GDP, samples of EF-Tu were heat denatured and precipitated and the concentration of released GDP remaining in solution was measured by absorbance spectroscopy [ 35].
Similar(58)
Previous, contradictory suggestions that Mal3 selectively binds to the seam were based on lower-resolution data from considerably smaller datasets and from more heterogeneous GDP microtubule samples (des Georges et al., 2008; Sandblad et al., 2006).
That is a huge gap: public spending averages 29% of GDP in their sample countries.In this section Online cannibals Complex equations Growing Basle Japan's debt menace Perks of the presidency Award IAN bites dog A shocking error ReprintsA statistical quirk?
More specifically, an increase of annual GDP in our sample of hurricane states by USD 1,000 billion (or 20%% of its 2005 value) would lead to an increase in the Gini coefficient of 0.043 or 4.3%%.
This has a negligible impact on the numerical results as h is very small (less than 1% of GDP) in the sample under consideration, i.e., before the global financial crisis.
Particularly illustrative are the results of Humphrey et al. (2006), who estimate that this shift could generate a total cost saving close to 1 % of GDP for a sample of 12 EU countries.
The age distribution of GDPs in both samples did not differ significantly compared with national data.
Preloaded [H]-GDP-bound Ras samples were mixed with the preceding buffer containing GEF or GAP (100 μl volume) for 30 min.
Samples with GDP contained 1.5 mM GDP and 5 mM MgCl2.
To elute nucleotides, 10 µl of elution buffer (0.2% SDS, 5 m m EDTA, 5 m m GTP and 5 m m GDP) was added, and samples were incubated at 65°C for 2 min. Eluted nucleotides were quantified using scintillation counting, and the amount of H-GTP or H-GDP bound at 15, 30 and 60 min was compared with the initial amount bound (0 time point).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com