Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
Motion detectors would help compensate for head and gaze movement, keeping images consistent throughout viewing.
The visual behaviors include eyelid movement, face orientation, and gaze movement (pupil movement).
Independent of where cost changes were applied (i.e., gaze or memory systems), all studies show an adaptation of the trade-off between gaze movement behavior and memorization processes.
Together with the fixation time for extracting information (e.g., 0.4 s for fixations during making tea: [27]; 0.3 s for fixations during comparative visual search: [24]; or 0.2 s for reading: [28]) the time required for a gaze movement and thus for visual acquisition of one piece of information amounts to about one second.
We conclude that for our task parameters (walking distance and pattern complexity), the trade-off operated on an overall higher memory level, whereas in the case of the gaze movement experiment, the trade-off seems to operate on a lower memory level.
Eye movement in the orbit was calculated as the difference between gaze movement and head movement.
Similar(47)
In the main experiment, we compared how 19 participants rated the two avatars in terms of pleasantness, trustworthiness and closeness when the avatars were following their gaze versus when the avatar generated gaze movements autonomously.
In a third ANOVA of eye gaze movements within backgrounds, there were no significant culture effects or interactions with culture.
One study directly compared eye movements alone, head movements alone, and gaze movements (combined eye- and head-movements) up to 14° of visual angle using fMRI [25].
This notion was also supported by our finding of more within-object gaze movements in the US compared to the Singapore participants.
Locomotion consumes much more time and energy than gaze movements and should therefore increase the costs for acquiring or updating information substantially.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com