Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

gave us with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "gave us with" is not correct in written English.
It is not a standard expression and does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "He gave us with the necessary tools for the project."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

It's what you gave us, with two years standing and watching".

News & Media

The New York Times

"So they're acknowledging that the budget they gave us with great confidence in that meeting was a complete fantasy".

News & Media

The New Yorker

This is what he gave us with his galvanic 1984 and with his revelatory, split-to-pieces Oresteia.

News & Media

The Guardian

My five-year-old daughter is going as little red riding hood - only because she happens to have a hooded cape which a friend gave us with some second hand clothes!

News & Media

The Guardian

"At that time, Japan still had nothing, so I still remember the candy they gave us, with Disney characters on the wrappers".

News & Media

Los Angeles Times

And so what I would do is look at the programs that LBJ gave us with the Great Society and they'd be gone.

News & Media

Huffington Post
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

According to McKinsey's Web site, "Our clients should never doubt that we will treat any information they give us with absolute discretion".

News & Media

The New York Times

And I think when you have an establishment-run nomination system, they give us a series of losers, which they've given us with Dole, and McCain, and Romney.

News & Media

The New York Times

We appreciate the trust that users give us with their information, and have no intention to violate that trust.

News & Media

TechCrunch

"It's a war between our bodies and the demands our body makes, and the accessibility that modern society gives us with food.

News & Media

BBC

Today, I believe it's Apple that's the closest to implementation, given the glimpse it's given us with iCloud.

News & Media

TechCrunch
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "gave us with". Instead, use more grammatically correct alternatives such as "provided us with", "supplied us with", or simply "gave us" depending on the intended meaning. For example, instead of "They gave us with the tools", say "They provided us with the tools" or "They gave us the tools".

Common error

A common mistake is adding "with" after "gave us" when it's unnecessary. "Gave us" already implies a transfer or provision. Adding "with" creates a redundant and ungrammatical structure. Always check if "with" adds value or if it's simply redundant. Say "They gave us the information" instead of "They gave us with the information".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "gave us with" functions as a verb phrase attempting to describe the act of providing something. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically incorrect. The intended meaning is to convey that someone provided or equipped the speaker with something, but the structure is not standard English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "gave us with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect, as Ludwig AI confirms. While it appears in some contexts, particularly in News & Media, it's advisable to avoid it in formal writing. Alternatives like "provided us with" or simply "gave us" are more appropriate. Pay close attention to preposition usage to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness, and remember that "gave us" already implies the act of providing, making "with" redundant in many cases. Therefore it should be avoided in favor of alternatives.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "gave us with"?

The correct way to express the idea is usually with "provided us with" or simply "gave us". For example, instead of "They gave us with the resources", you should say "They provided us with the resources" or "They gave us the resources".

What can I say instead of "gave us with"?

You can use alternatives like "provided us with", "supplied us with", or simply "gave us" depending on the context.

Is "gave us with" grammatically correct?

No, "gave us with" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use "gave us" or "provided us with". The addition of "with" after "gave us" is typically redundant and ungrammatical.

How do I avoid using "gave us with" in my writing?

To avoid using "gave us with", consider if the "with" is necessary. If it's not adding crucial information, remove it. If you need to specify what was provided, use "provided us with" followed by the item.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: