Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
Verification experiments gave a mean value of 33.57 g/L, confirming the accuracy of the model.
A comparison with in situ measurements gave a mean relative error of 23%.
An average of 120 particles gave a mean of 56 nm and standard deviation 16 nm.
The partial least squares regression model gave a mean error lower than 5% for all components presented in the mixture.
The case/theoretical mix gave a mean score of 3.71/10 and raised some food for thought.
This gave a mean external fixation index of 67.4 days/cm (12 610) in 26 limbs that underwent distraction osteogenesis.
Core samples gave a mean porosity value of 33.0% and a mean permeability value of 274 × 10−3 μm2.
Homogenization speed of 5,000 psi pressure for 3 cycles gave a mean particle size of 526 nm.
The AIE approach applied to nitrogen gave a mean pore width of 0.57 nm; the CO2 distribution exhibited wider dispersion.
Panels manufactured under the optimum combination of processing parameters gave a mean peel strength more than twice that of the worst panels.
The hybrid model proposed in this paper gave a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 8.35% on weekdays and 9.73% on weekends for the test data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com