LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) and nukes don't go together".
Another nasty positive comes from the fact that we have gained a lot of power over nature, from fertilizers and antibiotics to nerve gas and nukes.
On the missing "climate": Only a scathing remark from one candidate about investments in renewable energy being far too large, and from the other, a commitment to more U.S. coal, more U.S. oil, more U.S. unnatural (fracking) gas, more U.S. nukes and, oh yes, more U.S. solar and wind.
Natural gas prices crashed, making nukes look comparatively more expensive.
Moscow's strength all depends on largely useless nukes, exported gas and oil, and the perceived political strength of Putin.
Since the early 1970s we have argued that converting away from fossil and nuclear fuels -- coal, oil, nukes & gas -- and onto a Solartopian system based on renewables and efficiency is the only route to long-term prosperity.
At this point, a free market in energy, with no subsidies for ANY technology, would bring us a green-powered Solartopian planet very quickly, and King CONG -- coal, oil, nukes and gas -- would fade away very quickly.
He doesn't like nukes, or a gas tax holiday, or a national drilling spree - that's the "no" part.
Oil, gas, corn, coal, sun, wind, nuke, conservation, efficiency.
Plaid's Jonathan Edwards said nukes and liquified petroleum gas don't go together and we haven't heard much since of the First Minister's desire to bring nuclear weapons to Pembrokeshire.
