Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
However, different gambling preferences were associated with differences in the gamblers' age and gender profile.
New neurobiological PG research should include matched controls, account for comorbidity issues, and differentiate between gambling preferences.
Studies examining gambling preferences have identified the importance of the type of gambling practiced on distinct individual profiles.
The final aim of this study was to investigate whether specific gambling preferences could predict the severity of the disorder.
However, there is gender difference in the types of gambling (males: strategic-typed preferences in gambling; and females' gambling preferences: non-strategic forms (e.g. slot machine) [ 47]).
Studies examining gambling preferences have identified the important roles of accessibility and availability of gambling, as well as the technical and structural features associated with it.
Similar(51)
The reason as to why individuals engage in gambling activities is also important in determining the type of gambling preference.
However, Stevens and Young [ 14] and Bonnaire et al. [ 15], argue that gambling preference is not only explained by socio-demographic and psychopathological factors, but is related to more complex mechanisms, such as emotional and personality factors.
The relative contribution of the gambling preference on the level of psychopathology (SCL-90-R scores) and the severity of GD (SOGS-total score) was measured with multiple linear regressions, clustering the variables into three blocks.
Contrasts of Positive-Skew and Negative-Skew gamble preferences revealed that subjects preferred Positive-Skew to Negative-Skew gambles (Z = 2.59, p<0.01) and High-Variance to Negative-Skew gambles (Z = 3.68, p<0.001).
This chapter reviews various evidence from a set of paired choice and pricing tasks designed to determine whether subjects' revealed preferences over gambles are consistent with attempted risk preference induction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com