Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
In the CAS condition however, the gain for accommodation was significantly higher.
We found that continued correction of aberrations after the step change decreased the gain for disaccommodation, but increased the gain for accommodation.
Similar(58)
We found that the gain for the accommodation for this condition to be higher than that of accommodation, but the difference failed to reach statistical significance.
EM and YP showed no significant difference between the gain for disaccommodation and accommodation.
The average gain for disaccommodation and accommodation across all conditions and subjects was 1.06 ± 0.65 and 0.96 ± 0.42 respectively.
The difference between the gain for disaccommodation and accommodation averaged across all conditions was not statistically significant.
For accommodation the gain was significantly higher in CAS condition as compared to the SO condition; 1.11 versus 0.86.
For accommodation, all subjects had a larger gain value for the CAS condition in comparison to the SO condition.
We do note however that from Fig. 7, the gain results for disaccommodation tend to be more variable than for accommodation.
Three of the four subjects demonstrated a higher gain for the CDL condition in comparison to the SO condition for accommodation.
For the CAS condition across all subjects, the gain for disaccommodation was less than that of accommodation; 0.80 ± 0.52 versus 1.11 ± 0.40 (p = 0.007).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com