Exact(7)
The heterogeneity within reviews is of concern and should be identified more precisely by future reviewers.
The process of systematic review produces data and meta-data that is potentially useful for future reviewers and decision makers (see Background).
This paper does not argue that the various nomenclatures are unnecessary, but rather seeks to draw together and review the full range of methods of synthesis available to assist future reviewers in selecting a method that is fit for their purpose.
Encouraging researcher to publish study protocols, regardless of study design, specifying all phases of the studies could assist in this process and allow future reviewers of a manuscript to be able to evaluate the presented findings more accurately.
Developing and describing clear models of peer support would facilitate future trials and help future reviewers synthesise them more effectively.
The effort spent on literature screening and data extraction does not result in availability of this information for future reviewers, leading to duplication of effort.
Similar(53)
"Such knowledge transfer is critically important in retaining the community's trust in NSF's merit review procedures and in recruiting others to serve the foundation as future staff, reviewers, and advisors".
The creation of consensus guidelines for outcome definitions for this type of study would be very useful to promote further rigorous research and would support future systematic reviewers.
Early publication of this complex intervention development and evaluation data will enable clinicians and future systematic reviewers to determine the specification and evidence base for intervention components.
Subgroup analyses were provided for future systematic reviewers, but there was no suggestion that the treatment effect differed between subgroups by diagnosis or by baseline severity of communication impairment.
The novel "Sphere" (1987), about the underwater discovery of a naval vessel from the future, struck many reviewers as a disappointment.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com