Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
The idea of using a supermajority to bind future parliaments violates the notion of parliamentary sovereignty.
The price of his return in 1694 was the king's agreement to a Triennial Act governing the calling of future Parliaments.
He would also press for a sweeping change in election law that would give third parties proportional representation in future parliaments.
Lord Phillips, speaking this week at Inner Temple, set out his theory as to whether the Act can bind future parliaments.
But as long as it remains in place, the act can, and will, quite drastically affect laws passed by future parliaments.
Professor Luckhurst identified a clause in the charter that allows for it to be altered by future parliaments, provided there is a two-thirds majority in both houses, as a "red line in the sand" for newspaper publishers.
Similar(46)
Obviously a future parliament could change that.
A future Parliament was forbidden to legislate against it.
Parliament may pass a human rights act, but a future parliament could repeal or emasculate it.
"In the future, parliament may have the ability to do whatever it likes.
And there are circumstances in which it is entirely plausible that a future parliament would rescind the aid bill.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com