In future research, informant data might be analyzed separately and jointly in the interest of determining whether a meaningful "functional impact factor" could be extracted from PANSS data, compared to independent, previously validated measures and potentially applied to new studies of remission in schizophrenia.
Future studies should consider informant reports of autistic behaviours at the screening stage, to exclude the possibility of low reporting of ASD behaviours using self-report questionnaires.
Future research utilizing multi-informant methods might offer additional utility in examining the relationship between problem behaviors and suicidality among youth.
Given that self-report measures are likely impacted by informant biases, future research is likely to benefit from assessing these constructs utilizing contextual threat interviews [ 25], other-reports, and behavioral observations (i.e., multi-method, multi-informant approach).
For example, we analysed informants' recommendations for future advocacy to ascertain whether they would recommend continued cooperation or conflict with the federal government.
The faced resistance from significant others suggests the need to involve them during the recruitment of volunteers in the future as suggested by the informants themselves.
Therefore, adopting a multi-informant approach in future studies is advisable and would resolve some of the limitations present in the current study.
To avoid this in future, it is suggested that informant data is obtained with collective input from the clinical team, i.e. at ward round meetings.
It is not the most intelligent architects and cultural informants who decide our future urban tableaux, but Tesco, Urban Splash and their replicants.
Future studies should take other important informants, including the inmates themselves, into consideration.
