Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
There was no significant association between neurological conditions and future convictions for violent crime (OR 1.03, 95%% CI 0.48 2.21).
Table 1 shows bivariate logistic regression analyses between selected other potential risk factors measured at conscription and future convictions for violent crime.
Of all the diagnoses, substance-related disorders had the strongest association with future convictions for violent crime in Model I III, followed by mental retardation and personality disorders.
Not surprisingly, substance-related disorders were associated with an increased risk of future convictions for violent crime in line with what other studies have shown [ 39, 40].
A limitation is that women were exempted from conscription at that time, which restrains the generalisability of the findings of psychiatric diagnoses and future convictions for violent crime only to men.
Thirty-one questions contained information that corresponded to 30 variables in 11 domains in the violence risk assessment instruments and which were statistically significantly associated with risk of future convictions for violent crime and were therefore chosen as potential confounders/risk factors.
Similar(52)
Do psychiatric diagnoses in late adolescence increase the risk of a future conviction for violent crime?
Research questions: Do psychiatric diagnoses in late adolescence increase the risk of a future conviction for violent crime?
There was a significant association between receiving a psychiatric diagnosis at conscription and a future conviction for violent crime (odds ratio (OR) 3.83, 95%% confidence interval (CI) 3.47 4.22).
Which psychiatric diagnoses are most important for a future conviction for violent crime and what is the difference in their impacts?
The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of onset for a future conviction for violent crime after conscription in the group with no psychiatric diagnoses was 26.5 (8.1) years.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com