Sentence examples for future chemicals from inspiring English sources

These sections are included to take into account future needs for water- and chemical management and are, thus, also directed to a broader end-user group, i.e. involved in development of future chemicals policy and management criteria.

The vision for future chemicals policy is that pollutants should be dealt with in an integrated manner in an overarching chemicals policy framework covering all types of chemicals and all uses, beyond the current sector-specific regulations.

In 2001, during the preparation of the REACH legislation, the Commission of the European Communities (COM) considered the substitution of hazardous chemicals as one of the 'key elements' of the proposed 'Strategy for a future Chemicals Policy' [[7]].

The developed QSAR model can be used to predict existing as well as future chemicals falling within the applicability domain of the model in order to reduce the use of animals.

Since the focus is not only the current situation but also future chemicals management, the conceptual framework also describes activities where existing scenarios are used to predict which chemicals or groups of chemicals will be of importance in the years to come.

He could then give Mr. Assad the option of allowing United Nations personnel to visit chemical weapon sites and eliminate the possibility of future chemical weapon use.

But Mr. Hammond recalled the faulty intelligence that led Britain to support the 2003 invasion of Iraq as reason to establish a legally credible chain of custody for evidence of past or future chemical attacks.

Yet the sharply limited goals Mr. Obama has described in explaining his rationale for taking military action now — "a shot across the bow" to halt future chemical attacks, he told PBS — pose risks of their own.

Miller describes why he thinks Obama will decide soon to undertake some kind of military attack, arguing that in doing so the United States would seek to save face after having threatened to do so in the event of chemical weapons use; to prevent future chemical attacks and to demonstrate to Iran a willingness to fight.

On the phone call, Trump listened approvingly to the hit-'em-hard advice: that, politically, "the minimum should be bigger than it was last year," when Trump had launched a single-day strike on a Syrian airfield, designed unsuccessfully, as it turned out to deter future chemical-weapons use.

While norm enforcement and deterring future chemical attacks can be a justifiable rationale, the idea that the US would engage Syria over one category of weapons while doing nothing to stop the civil war that has taken 100,000 lives seems to many to be illogical.