Sentence examples for furthering scientific knowledge from inspiring English sources

His ambitions, however, were not limited to furthering scientific knowledge.

The main objective of the CoRISpe is to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge on paediatric HIV infection by providing demographic, sociopsychological, clinical and laboratory data from HIV-infected paediatric patients.

He and a team of scientists withstood incredible hardships  and perished before reaching home, but not before they had discovered a large number of zoological and geological specimens that greatly furthered scientific knowledge of the vast region.

A member of The Rockefeller University Council for twenty-six years, Irv was a devoted partner in our efforts to further scientific knowledge for the benefit of human health.

We recognise it as non-essential to further scientific knowledge, and since none is genuinely called upon to suffer physical hardship and danger on behalf of humanity, to do so in the pursuit of glory is regarded as something as an indulgence.

Reagents are shared within the community to replicate findings and to further scientific knowledge in new avenues of investigation.

A particularly high percentage of participants do not grasp the full meaning of statistical information about risks, or the fact that in placebo controlled trials, they might not receive the treatment under investigation, or the fact that trials aim to further scientific knowledge and not necessarily their own medical good.

If researchers close in on a potential test for CTE, it could further scientific knowledge about the condition and point the way toward a cure, said Dr. Anthony Alessi, an associate clinical professor of neurology and orthopedics at UConn Health.

Spending on research in these two countries also demonstrates the ability and desire to further scientific knowledge and focused collaboration.

Patient selection in an explanatory approach is based on the principles of homogenous population, primarily aiming to further scientific knowledge.

McDaniel et al. (2005) made no attempt to further scientific knowledge; therefore, their article appears to fall short of the scientific standards of EHP.